data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13938/1393861fb600bb66250d4b030273f623fd010102" alt=""
J'ai beaucoup de respect pour lui. Les gens disent beaucoup de choses à son sujet, mais il est intelligent et je trouve qu'il a bien joué ses cartes en disant d'avance: ils chercheront à nuir à ma réputation pour détourner l'attention du message.
J'ai lu dernièrement que Mark Gravel (le sénateur qui a dévoilé les 'Pentagon Papers' a dit que ça aurait dû être un politicien qui aurait dû avoir le courage de révéler ces choses - il aurait eu l'immunité parlementaire et n'aurait pas eu besoin de fuir à l'étranger comme l'a fait Snowden.
Ici il y a un document avec le témoignage de Snowden à une commission européene (in English).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a60b6/a60b67b691f04dc78bb22d5d51ed26a34e2287c7" alt=""
And I have a lot of respect for the guy. People are saying all kinds of things about him, but I think he's smart, because most of the things are things he's already predicted they will try: spreading dirt on the messenger to draw attention away from the message.
I read somewhere (but can't find the link now), that Mark Gravel (the senator who 'leaked' the Pentagon Papers by 'reading them into the congressional record' - i.e. read them out in a congressional committee such that they had to be transcribed into a publicly-available document) said that Snowden shouldn't have had to sacrifice his security and future to leak this information: because senators or congressman should have already brought it to the public.
Read this: it's Snowden's testimony to an EU enquiry. I love this bit:
Who is currently financing your life?
I am
No comments yet :
Post a Comment